Drug Use in Sports
Pros and Cons
Video exploring critical thinking and how it leads to great citizen involvement
Should Performance Enhancing Drugs (Such as Steroids) Be Accepted in Sports?
Drug Use in Sports
Proponents of accepting performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) in sports argue that their harmful health effects have been overstated, that health risks are an athlete’s decision to make, that using drugs is part of the evolution of sports much like improved training techniques and new technologies, and that efforts to keep athletes from using PEDs are overzealous, unproductive, unfairly administered, and bound to fail.

Opponents argue that PEDs are harmful and potentially fatal, and that athletes who use them are cheaters who gain an unfair advantage, violate the spirit of competition, and send the wrong message to children. They say PED users unfairly diminish the historic achievements of clean athletes, and that efforts to stop PED use in sports should remain strong.

Core Question
Top 10 Pros & Cons
Did You Know?
Historical Timeline

Sports and Drugs ProCon.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that presents research, studies, and pro and con statements on questions related to the use of performance enhancing drugs in sports. This website uses the term "performance enhancing drugs" to mean legal and illegal drugs that are considered to enhance performance in sports. The term "performance enhancing" is sometimes spelled with a hyphen and sometimes without. We have opted for the unhyphenated spelling.

Pros & Cons by Category
Performance Enhancing Drugs
"Blood Doping" and Erythropoietin (EPO)
Human Growth Hormone (HGH)
Hall of Fame
Drug Testing
Moral and Ethical Issues
Public Policy
Athletes as Role Models
Donate to ProCon.org

Share your thoughts on sports and drugs and read, vote on, and reply to existing comments. Join the debate.

Teacher Survey

Notices for Drug Use in Sports and Other ProCon.org Information (archived after 30 days)

3/4/2015 - US Department of Labor Cites ProCon.org for Its 'Up-to-Date Information' on Same-Sex Marriage - Another example of the utility and credibility of ProCon.org at the highest levels of government. To date, 24 international governments, 30 US state governments, and 10 federal agencies have referenced ProCon.org research.

3/3/2015 - 20 Lesson Plan Ideas with Common Core Correlations – Free curricula to help teach counterargument, distinguish fact from opinion, analyze primary sources, build research speed, and other thoughtful lessons related to critical thinking. Lessons are listed by grade level and include adaptations and Common Core standards met.

Archived Notices (archived after 30 days)


Last updated on 7/1/2014 5:43:29 PM PST

Please enter a valid email address to continue.
Privacy Policy Do not show again.
DONATE - Donate to ProCon.org - DONATE
Visit the ProCon.org community on:

© 2015 ProCon.org, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit     |   233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Santa Monica, CA 90401    |    Tel: 310-451-9596